Subject: Re: PAM enabled by default in packages that support it?
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/25/2005 10:14:01
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> Now that PAM is in the base system, seems like packages that support PAM
> should have that support enabled by default, yes?
This is fine, so long as the packages in question include pam.buildlink3.mk
and do *not* turn on the support if PAM_TYPE ends up as "none" (for OS's not
supporting one of the pkgsrc-supplied PAM packages).
On that note, I'll now add a special conditional to pam.buildlink3.mk to
prevent use of any pkgsrc pam packages on Interix, as that needs... a little
work, considering its auth system is very weird. :)
-- Todd Vierling <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>