Subject: Re: teTeX 3.0 packages imported
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Antoine Reilles <Antoine.Reilles@loria.fr>
Date: 04/06/2005 22:50:08
I worked a little on this idea to provide a splitted layout for texmf trees
with teTeX3, as the teTeX doc recommands.
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 05:00:50PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Antoine Reilles wrote:
> >Why not follow the layout the teTeX author propose (in
> >/usr/pkg/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf and
> >http://www.tug.org/teTeX/tetex-src/INSTALL or in the tetex manual
> >http://www.tug.org/teTeX/texmf/doc/tetex/TETEXDOC.pdf page 8) ?
> In short, you mean put the teTeX3-share pkg's files=20
> into share/texmf-dist instead of share/texmf?
> >You can count me as interested in helping in this task
> I'd very much appreciate help on this! Can you send me some patches for
> pkgsrc on things you think should be changed? Or at least a brief
> description of the changes you think should be made? No URLs I have to dig
> out and guess what you mean please. :)
I came out adding a mk/latex.mk file, highly inspired by the emacs.mk one, to
provide dependancy, variables to chose which teTeX to depend on, and variables
to help packaging. I called it latex, and used variables with the name latex
since i'm not sure tetex will be the major (and almost only) latex under unix.
I also modified the teTeX3-texmf package to reflect the texmf layout reommanded
in tetex doc, and modified to test it the bibtex2html and latex2html packages
(only this one is really interesting, as it installs files in the texmf tree).
I have put the diff and the latex.mk file on:
(this one is big, because the PLIST is huge)
Please let me know if you have any
comment or critics.