Subject: Re: right place/name for sylpheed-1.9.x ?
To: Juan RP <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Joel CARNAT <email@example.com>
Date: 03/30/2005 17:55:26
On the last episode (Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:47:25 +0200), Juan RP <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:44:55 +0200
> Joel CARNAT <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > According to sylpheed-gtk2's homepage, this thread is dead and the
> > whole thing has been imported in a new sylpheed branch. I've done a
> > quick and dirty pkgsrc for it but don't really know how to name it. As
> > I understood sylpheed's homepage, 1.9.x is the beta branch, which will
> > become 2.x when stable enough (I guess). A major change is the use of
> > GTK2 rather that GTK1.
> > As I suppose some people will require to still be able to use gtk1 (for
> > performance issue on tiny machine), I'm not sure whether to post my
> > pkgsrc as sylpheed, sylpheed2 or sylpheed-gtk2.
> > I guess that sylpheed-claws will also be impacted when sylpheed will go
> > 2.x, so I'm not sure keeping 1.x as sylpheed (rather than sylpheed1) is
> > the nice way to go.
> > I see things like evolution, evolution12, evolution14 which seems to
> > face the same conflics (evolution is evolution-2.0.4).
> > So, what's would be the most accurate name for this sylpheed-1.9.7
> > (beta branch) pkgsrc ?
> There's already mail/sylpheed-devel (1.9.7 actually).
woops - didn't see it (since I switched to pkgsrc-2005Q1).
,-- This mail runs ---------.
`------------ NetBSD/i386 --'