Subject: Re: Speeding up check-vulnerable
To: Roland Illig <email@example.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/27/2005 03:42:26
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
> One point for discussion is clearly the naming. When you call
> $ pkg_admin vuln perl-5.8.6nb2 \
First, I see no real gain in adding this to pkg_admin, as I think it's
rather uncommon to run this interactively. Waiting 5-15 seconds in the
daily output shouldn't hurt to add this to pkg_*. (I'm conservative about
breaking up the "combine tools" approach).
Then, the syntax seems backwards. What you seem to want is to check one,
several, or all pkgs against a list of patterns, and see if it matches.
For a more generic approach, you want to have
* a list with patterns (only; easy to get, and doesn't hardcode the
format of the pkg-vulnerabilities file into pkg_admin).
* none, one or more packages or pkg patterns, that then get checked
against the list of patterns, and print all the names (not?) matching.
See the "pkg_admin check" syntax.
Maybe someone else wants to voice an opinion if all this should be
NetBSD - Free AND Open! (And of course secure, portable, yadda yadda)