Subject: Re: pkg_alternatives as a dependency, again
To: C. <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Julio M. Merino Vidal <email@example.com>
Date: 02/12/2005 10:35:43
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 00:09 -0300, César Catrián C. wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:33:48 -0800 (PST)
> "Jeremy C. Reed" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > Please stop putting interfaces in front of users' faces, you evil guy. You
> > > should be punished.
> > >
> > > At the first read I expected this stuff to die. It has been getting too far.
> > As it is now, it is optional.
> As optional, it would be nice if it could save its ALTERNATIVES records in their
> own package/directory/config-file.
And this is what it already does.
Julio M. Merino Vidal <email@example.com>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/