Subject: ImageMagick, libwmf, and xpm
To: None <email@example.com>
From: John Klos <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/04/2005 15:20:08
I just noticed that ImageMagick now requires X11. Is this necessary? I
don't remember it being required in the past.
ImageMagick has as a dependency libwmf. libwmf includes
../../graphics/xpm/buildlink3.mk. xpm wasn't built or installed on my 2.0
system when I installed ImageMagick, but on a 1.6.2 system, it gave
security issues for xpm when it started trying to compile it.
I've removed the ../../graphics/xpm/buildlink3.mk includes in libwmf, and
it's built just fine. Since there are so many security problems with xpm,
should I just commit the changes to libwmf?