To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Alan Barrett <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/04/2005 10:55:21
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> > LICENSE= fee-based-commercial-use
> In pkgsrc, when dealing with licensing issues, we err on the side of
That reminds me: I often want to accept licences on a per-package
basis, not on a per-licence-class basis. For example,
instead of "ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES+= fee-based-commercial-use"
I want to be able to say:
# I don't intend to make any commercial use of LAME.
I have personal patches that allow this, but I haven't got around
to submitting them as a PR.
--apb (Alan Barrett)