Subject: Re: substitutes framework ?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/31/2005 18:37:37
Thanks all for the SUBST_* suggestion. It's exactly what I need.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:31:05AM +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> BTW, use pre-configure as the stage, _not_ post-patch. This way, when
> somebody does 'make patch' to later edit the patches manually, he won't
> get any changes that are done automatically (which happens from time to
> time, breaking existing patches).
Good point. I've used pre-configure. BTW, I noticed some packages use
post-patch for this :)
Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference