Mark Davies wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 January 2005 18:12, Johnny C. Lam wrote:
>>                         I'm not sure why it's working in this case, but not
>>in other cases that have been reported to me.  I'll just hope that it
>>continues to work, and perhaps we'll figure out the real reason in the
>>future. 
> 
> I think that the bits of kdevelop-base that actually use db3 happen to not 
> pull in those things that use db4.

In that case, there is absolutely no problem with directly including 
db3/buildlink3.mk in the kdevelop-base Makefile, although this fact 
should be noted in a prominent comment in the Makefile.

	Cheers,

	-- Johnny Lam <jlam@NetBSD.org>