Subject: Re: tiff shouldn't require C++
To: Johnny C. Lam <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Dieter Baron <email@example.com>
Date: 01/10/2005 12:30:13
In article <20050109231223.GA94794@phoenix.buildlink.org> Johnny wrote:
: I've attached a patch to create a separate libtiffcxx.so library for
: use by C++ applications. It's meant to be used directly in place of
: libtiff.so, i.e. instead of linking against -ltiff, you link against
: -ltiffcxx. It also leaves libtiff.so as a plain C-linkage library
: Please review/comment as I'd like to commit this on Tuesday.
On closer inspection I realized that API functions are removed from
libtiff; shouldn't we bump it's major number?