Subject: Re: tiff shouldn't require C++
To: Johnny C. Lam <>
From: Dieter Baron <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 01/10/2005 12:30:13
In article <> Johnny wrote:
: I've attached a patch to create a separate library for
: use by C++ applications.  It's meant to be used directly in place of
:, i.e. instead of linking against -ltiff, you link against
: -ltiffcxx.  It also leaves as a plain C-linkage library
: again.

: Please review/comment as I'd like to commit this on Tuesday.

  On closer inspection I realized that API functions are removed from
libtiff; shouldn't we bump it's major number?