On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 11:15:56PM -0600, Min Sik Kim wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 09:42:29 -0500
> "Johnny C. Lam" <jlam@NetBSD.org> wrote:
> > 
> > I admit that I didn't forsee this particular problem.  Perhaps we should 
> > only symlink the perl binary into the tools directory for those packages 
> > that request it for now.
> 
> IMO, setting the perl path to something different from ${PERL5} is a
> bug.  It would be better to reveal and fix them.

I also admit that I didn't look into the fixes that you made very closely ;)
Yes, you're right -- we shouldn't be forcibly setting the perl path to
anything other than PERL5.

	Cheers,

	-- Johnny Lam <jlam@NetBSD.org>