Subject: Re: a pkgsrc available file
To: Dieter Baron <email@example.com>
From: Jeremy C. Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/28/2004 13:18:57
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Dieter Baron wrote:
> Thank's for doing this, I think it was long overdue.
Here is a complete file:
It is for packages from pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD-2.0/i386/All/
Note that deleted packages (like tiff) were not readded. So thie
"available" list doesn't include the missing tiff.
> : Should I include the +SIZE_ALL information too?
> I don't think that would be very usefull. More interesting is, how
> much space is needed for the dependencies that need to be installed,
> which can be computed quite easily.
+SIZE_ALL is the space needed for the dependencies. Right now the Size:
field just shows the extracted size of the package.
> I don't think including URLs is a good idea, since it makes it
> harder to mirror/move the packages plus the available file.
Okay. As it is now, it is easily figured out from the information
> : Also, as I mentioned in other email: maybe I should remove the
> : LibRequires: of anything provided by same package. (Or maybe that doesn't
> : matter since an intelligent program can quickly see it in the LibProvides:
> : field.)
> I would prefer for them to be removed from LibRequires: Put the
> logic into the one program creating the file instead of all of the N
> programs using it.
Okay. I'll look at that.
> : And maybe we should use objdump (or platform specific tool) to build the
> : REQUIRES (my LibRequires) instead of ldd so only direct library
> : dependencies will be listed.
> That sounds like an excelent idea. Also, possibly omit libraries
> from the base system, or at least mark them as such?
The base system libraries needed are useful too just in case someone has a
I don't have the maintainer in the database because I think someone told
me months ago that they preferred that it was not included.
Jeremy C. Reed
BSD News, BSD tutorials, BSD links