Subject: Re: libtool *.la files vs. pkg-config *.pc files
To: NetBSD Packages Technical Discussion List <tech-pkg@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Greg Troxel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/05/2004 19:37:41
I suppose for my purposes, and for pkgsrc in general, it's probably best
to simply patch the libpangoxft.pc file so that pkg-config gives the
full list of dependencies.....
I think this is just a pango bug in generating its .pc file. I've
written .pc.in files, and included all the libs that the library being
built is linked against.
This is all messy, but pkg-config done right seems sane. Of course,
that's not the question on the table for pkgsrc. So fixing up the
.pc file seems like the right thing.
tiff obviously needs a .pc file, so users don't have to know about
The bigger question though is whether or not pkg-config should get its
list of dependent libraries from the libtool.la file(s) where possible,
Perhaps, but pkg-config seems pretty based on reading .pc files, and
no more, at runtime. I can see how using .la files to link with at
library build time can lead to this desire, however. I don't want to
discourage you from fixing pkg-config in this direction, but that's
out of scope for pkgsrc.
Greg Troxel <email@example.com>