Subject: Re: shared objects installed without execute permission bogus
To: Todd Vierling <>
From: Juan RP <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 10/28/2004 02:45:34
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:39:22 -0400 (EDT)
Todd Vierling <> wrote:

> [*] Which makes me wonder what the big deal is.  It's just a few lines of
>     text in the build output; what is the problem?  Would putting the code
>     in question under PKG_DEVELOPER=YES make it more palatable?

Yes, because if the application/library works without exec permissions, who
cares about this? you're right and this should be fixed, but the end user
does not need to fix them.

Adding the checks only when PKG_DEVELOPER=YES is the way to go IMHO.

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)