--Signature=_Thu__28_Oct_2004_02_45_34_+0200_31NTOvTkO71co92C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:39:22 -0400 (EDT)
Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org> wrote:

> [*] Which makes me wonder what the big deal is.  It's just a few lines of
>     text in the build output; what is the problem?  Would putting the code
>     in question under PKG_DEVELOPER=YES make it more palatable?

Yes, because if the application/library works without exec permissions, who
cares about this? you're right and this should be fixed, but the end user
does not need to fix them.

Adding the checks only when PKG_DEVELOPER=YES is the way to go IMHO.

--Signature=_Thu__28_Oct_2004_02_45_34_+0200_31NTOvTkO71co92C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBgEEuypkLYVDran0RAmUIAJ9PssJmG6D/yXEhWC3+0t2LuwDUEwCdETiI
Lmm6bkHbUyR6w7kdqpWsxrc=
=CKMd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Thu__28_Oct_2004_02_45_34_+0200_31NTOvTkO71co92C--