Subject: Re: Perl still broken on 2.0
To: John Klos <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Frederick Bruckman <email@example.com>
Date: 10/18/2004 09:38:49
In article <Pine.NEB.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
email@example.com (John Klos) writes:
> Is there a PR about this? I can't see how 2.0 is going to be released if
> we can't even build perl!
I agree that's bad, but the state of pkgsrc has nothing to do with
the NetBSD 2.0 release. Thankfully, they've been decoupled.
> (2.0, current pkgsrc, lang/perl58)
Does it build on the stable (2004Q3) branch? I understand that the
binary packages under the NetBSD-2.0 directory will be built from
that branch. For what it's worth, "perl" builds fine on the branch