Subject: Doubled dependancies?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Richard Rauch <email@example.com>
Date: 10/04/2004 16:53:23
"pkg_info emacs" returns this for the dependancies, now:
...looks fishy. (^& Is anyone else seeing this? (I updated pkgsrc
quite recently.) It doesn't seem especially harmful, but also does
not look right.
This doesn't seem to have been mentioned in tech-pkg that I can see, so
as far as I know it is unreported and unplanned. I've never seen it
before, so I assume that it is relatively new.
Or does it reflect indirect dependancies? Shouldn't only the "highest"
dependancy be displayed?
"I probably don't know what I'm talking about." http://www.olib.org/~rkr/