Subject: Re: Package naming and major versions [was Re: CVS commit:
To: None <darcy@NetBSD.org>
From: Julio M. Merino Vidal <email@example.com>
Date: 10/03/2004 11:18:36
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 04:58:38 -0400
"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@NetBSD.org> wrote:
> Nice. I assume that the mid-level Makefile would only build the latest
> version so that we don't have to change our scripts and/or meta packages
> when new versions are added. I suppose some targets (e.g. clean) could
> be made to work with all sub-packages.
The latest may not be appropiate in some cases... in this scenario, we'd
easily have development packages in pkgsrc (so you'd want the mid-level
makefile build the latest stable version).
Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/