Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/gal20
To: Rene Hexel <email@example.com>
From: Jeremy C. Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/02/2004 07:57:35
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Rene Hexel wrote:
> I don't think this is a good idea. This way we will have to keep
> renaming packages (as this is a moving target), with tons of
> unnecessary rebuilds. If packages are renamed at all, I would suggest
> renaming gal to gal1 and gal2 to gal22. This way, there is no "gal"
> package and there is no need to constantly rename packages in the
That sounds like a good idea. (Although my preference is to have
package names and directory like gal2.2, such as gal2.2-2.2.1).
Jeremy C. Reed
open source, Unix, *BSD, Linux training