Subject: Re: recursive pkg_tarup?
To: Steven M. Bellovin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 09/28/2004 01:17:11
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> That's only going one level deep: the dependencies of the package you
> list explicitly, at least on 1.6.1. (Is that changed on 1.6.2, which
> seems to be the newest version of pkg_tarup?)
Ah, the effect of us not recording all depends any more,
and pkg_info not displaying it either.
At least the latter deserves a PR...
("Sorry Steven, NetBSD is broken right now")
If wishes were wings, o" )~ would fly. -- Go www.NetBSD.org!