Subject: Re: suse/linux default package versions
To: Eric Haszlakiewicz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
Date: 09/20/2004 09:33:13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 01:59:47PM -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> Given the latest firefox/mozilla/thunderbird vulnerabilities I figured
> it'd be a good thing to take a look at updating those packages. Well,
> actually just firefox, since that's what I use. (yes, I know there's a
> freeze right now)
> Those need the 9.1 version of the suse libraries. I was thinking
> about changing the default linux emul packages to be those, and adding
> a variable (LINUX_USE_SUSE73) to use the old ones if necessary.
> So far, the new libraries seem to work ok for me, but I'm using -current
> and 2.0. Does anyone know if they work on 1.6.x? What has other
> people's experience with the stability of the new suse packages been?
about half the time, Firefox/Mozilla/etc. segfault on startup using
these libraries for me on -current (though admittedly I haven't tried
it for a while, so maybe the compat_linux bugs have been fixed). I
observed the same with the Debian pkgs I imported into wip.
I would prefer that we get the Debian pkgs into pkgsrc and default to
those, as SuSE have de-supported everything but i386, which is
inappropriate for pkgsrc.
If you really want to add a knob to use the suse91 pkgs, do that
for now instead of making it the default (better the devil we know..)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----