Subject: Re: fluxbox and -funroll-loops
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Jan Schaumann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/01/2004 09:27:44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
"Johnny C. Lam" <jlam@NetBSD.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:30:12AM -0400, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > I don't think that's necessary. I don't believe that our packages
> > should try to compile every package with every possible CFLAG and then
> > add the necessary transforms just in case the user chooses to add that
> > CFLAG manually.
> We don't have to go out of our way to hunt down these bad
> option/package pairs, but when we notice them, it's rather easy to
> just fix it.
I guess so. It just felt like we're trying too hard to prevent the user
from shooting him/her in the foot. This might lead to more and more
Just a friendly warning. :-)
Except most of the good bits were about frogs, I remember that.
You would not believe some of the things about frogs.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----