Subject: Re: New USE_LIBTOOL feature: OS testers needed
To: Todd Vierling <>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 08/16/2004 17:48:24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 10:55:56AM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Love wrote:
> > > I was following the model used by most partially dynamic PLIST
> > > generation, which typically keeps data in Makefile only.  (Related
> > > to that, to me it seemed more error-prone to mention the .la in
> > > both Makefile *and* PLIST.)
> >
> > Shouldn't just the logic do the magic all .la files in the PLIST
> > (unless excluded) ?
> It's quite a bit more bizarre to try doing this because of the way
> final PLISTs are created, but I've been looking at this as a
> possibility.  "Stay tuned."

keep in mind that under pkgviews PLISTs are *not* used.  it seems to be
a bad idea from long-term POV.  also, i find it confusing and
unnecessary, the convention in pkgsrc is to control things in Makefile,
not PLIST.


-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (NetBSD)