Subject: Re: New USE_LIBTOOL feature: OS testers needed
To: Love <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/16/2004 10:55:56
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Love wrote:
> > I was following the model used by most partially dynamic PLIST generation,
> > which typically keeps data in Makefile only. (Related to that, to me it
> > seemed more error-prone to mention the .la in both Makefile *and* PLIST.)
> Will print-PLIST deal with this ?
The changes do deal with it, yes; if LIBTOOL_LA_FILES contains a .la, its
entries are excluded from the output PLIST template.
> Shouldn't just the logic do the magic all .la files in the PLIST (unless
> excluded) ?
It's quite a bit more bizarre to try doing this because of the way final
PLISTs are created, but I've been looking at this as a possibility. "Stay
-- Todd Vierling <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>