Subject: Re: quick RFC: "jdk" -> "jdk11"?
To: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Juan RP <email@example.com>
Date: 07/29/2004 16:48:32
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Now that lang/jdk12 exists (and lang/jdk13 is soon to come), lang/jdk seems
> a little unusual in naming compared to the other Java implementations.
> It's probably not obvious to most users that lang/jdk is only a JDK 1.1
> implementation and not capable of running many modern Java applications.
> Ideally, it would be nice to delete lang/jdk altogether, but lang/jdk12 has
> redistribution restrictions. So instead, what do y'all think of renaming
> lang/jdk to lang/jdk11?
I really agree, does that mean that we'll have in the future lang/jdk as jdk13?
that would be cool.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----