On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Roland Illig wrote:

> Yes, but -- as far as I understood -- "make replace" should rather be called
> "make su-replace". A real "make replace" that works like "make install" is
> missing, isn't it?

Can you send-pr that so we don't keep forgetting about it?

(Also can someone (agc or grant) look at NetBSD Problem Report #19218?)

Thanks,

 Jeremy C. Reed

 	  	 	 technical support & remote administration
	  	 	 http://www.pugetsoundtechnology.com/