Subject: BUILD_DEPENDS and builtin.mk
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de>
Date: 07/07/2004 13:12:13
just found that a builtin.mk file is ignored if the
dependency is established by just a BUILD_DEPENDS.
So it appearently needs a full ".include buildlink3.mk"
and a "BUILDLINK_DEPMETHOD=build" to make this work
Is this intended? Is direct use of BUILD_DEPENDS
(Background: Some pkgs (eg sysutils/cdrecord) invoke
groff explicitely to format manpages. If it is not
available in the system, a buildtime dependency is