Subject: Re: Should perl58 default to threaded under NetBSD 2.0?
To: David Brownlee <abs@NetBSD.org>
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 06/22/2004 10:47:40
--=-=-=


David Brownlee <abs@NetBSD.org> writes:

> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, grant beattie wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 09:40:37AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
>>
>> I'd be against changing the default because it is likely to result in
>> a less stable perl and is only useful for a small number of packages.
>
>  	Then we need a way to make p5-GD work on NetBSD 2.0.
[...]
>         which probably involves making our
>  	  X11 tree nonthreaded.

This last thing isn't true, our X11 uses threadlib and will work with and
without threaded applications.

Love


--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUAQNfyLXW+NPVfDpmCAQK5qwf+N11b2zAc3Xg4tJmMOW6/iYzs2N/VX5QJ
aetT2dorzpnU7HPmA7nCHeg7xuTzSI8CF0dDUS5SMUDbiNNUQZ0u85TdLe9WgL3v
3n5JduQG3aiofFqCAYP7asCOzC69ROuWKTeg2VqWbTXw7mu5AOgsaTZUCfx69pgT
HhZ9xajsrED5UMR7sVanFO9W3v2YqETZZ0AMktfnPzaRRMMDFOvDw76PQ3vjnFAZ
g8PzxTNAwvh3Ci30xlNV59orUQRxWxENfqyx7kNnPGbOeTL5gZ7DA7RrNunPv7ex
3Y/dTUyoypDJWgLQvvHof+NNGtO0YVCgnv5VTXG/0bOy7fTiKFL63Q==
=uELc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--