Subject: Re: New package ap2-python
To: Marc Recht <email@example.com>
From: D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@NetBSD.org>
Date: 06/11/2004 07:18:27
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:55:28 +0200
Marc Recht <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Actually it is based on the FreeBSD port. I guess I should look at
> You could clean up some FreeBSD ports specific variables like
> USE_REINPLACE and MESSAGE should be FreeBSD specific since there's no
I had already removed the MESSAGE lines. You must have picked up an
older version before I repackaged it. I am removing USE_REINPLACE. It
looks like USE_PYTHON and MAKE_ENV can be removed as well.
> libc_r on NetBSD. You also don't need to include apr's buildlink3.mk
> directly if you set APCHE_MODULE to yes. I'm not sure aobut the
Gone and gone.
> entry and the patch. I don't have these in my pkg and builds and (or
The patch was actually done by the Makefile when Python 2.3 or greater
was used. I simply made 2.3 a requirement and made it a straight patch.
> not) works the same, but I didn't test it on any other platform than
> NetBSD 2.0_BETA. I'm also not sure if it runs with python23 (without
That's what I am testing.
> > yours for differences. As for the Mutex errors, I have someone
> > setting up the conf file to use the module now. I will let you know
> > what happens.
> I just tried it and I am havin the same problems with it:
I suspect that it won't be an issue since I am using unthreaded Python
but I will let you know.
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@NetBSD.org>