Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/gccAda-3.4
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Jan Schaumann <email@example.com>
Date: 06/01/2004 15:03:44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
"John R. Shannon" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I'm about to commit a gcc 3.4 package. These comments apply to both.
> I think that we probably want both for awhile. With gcc 3.4, there are=20
> entirely new c++ and fotran front-ends. The Ada build process has changed=
> significantly; I was unable to follow the gcc3 package structure.
> With the new C++, a number of packages do not build.
If we want to keep both, then the currently existing lang/gcc3-* are not
named correctly, as they would in fact be gcc3.3-*.
> > > Update of /cvsroot/pkgsrc/lang/gccAda-3.4
Does this mean that the import of gcc-3.4 would lead to the following
IMHO that's pretty ugly. Maybe that should then be:
But as I said, then we probably would have to rename the existing gcc3
packages. Neither sounds appealing to me.
I do appreciate your work on getting 3.4 into pkgsrc - thanks for that.
I just noticed the ada package as being oddly named, as I haven't
This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----