Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/gccAda-3.4
To: Jan Schaumann <email@example.com>
From: John R. Shannon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/01/2004 12:54:51
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 12:51 pm, you wrote:
> "John R. Shannon" <email@example.com> wrote:
> > In light of your post, should I hold off on importing gcc-3.4?
> As what do you want to import gcc-3.4? As an update to gcc3-* or as
> separate packages? If separate, what's the benefit of maintaining
> gcc3-* (which then would be not accurately named)? If as an update,
> then why did you import ada separate?
1. It is a separate package. I've been working on it on wip for 5 months.
2. It should probably eventually replace gcc3. For now, because:
- C++ is more strigently check causing a number of packages not to comp=
- I've only been able to test on ix86 and AMD 64 with NetBSD
I recommend that it be a separate package
> Maybe bring this up on tech-pkg to see what others think?
I have a cut at a mk/compiler/gcc.mk update that I've been using here if=20
anyone is interested.
John R. Shannon
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----