Subject: Re: Building without "modern" font support
To: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
From: Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.unixbsd.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 05/16/2004 05:48:55
--Signature=_Sun__16_May_2004_05_48_55_+0200_Zi0mf7Xj5PQphKXW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, 15 May 2004 16:31:47 +0200
Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de> wrote:

> Why is that? Besides of bugs in pkgsrc patches or laziness of authors?

The second one :)
 
> The disk space does not bother me - but xftcache giving different results
> denpending on wether it's /usr/pkg/bin/xftcache or /usr/X11R6/bin/xftcache
> makes me shiver. Combined with overall unaccaptable bad render quality,
> I think having half your software linked against /usr/X11R6/lib/font*.so and
> the other half against /usr/pkg/lib/font*.so is not a good idea.

Yes, this is a problem.
 
> Anyway, I'm not insisting on this - if anyone can show me a way to make X
> and pkgsrc produce good font output, I'll gladly remove all my pkgs and
> start
> building from scratch.

I don't understand what you mean by "good font output". I use
pkgsrc/fonts/ms-ttf and vera bitstream fonts under all gtk2/qt applications,
and the quality is good (IMHO) and enough for me.

-- 
	Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.unixbsd.org>

--Signature=_Sun__16_May_2004_05_48_55_+0200_Zi0mf7Xj5PQphKXW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFApuSnypkLYVDran0RAujGAKCu8PChZmFLDVmlEk913gmes+8eFACePdet
K/8UnzEu9yyKnou6gMt7PBs=
=YGHW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sun__16_May_2004_05_48_55_+0200_Zi0mf7Xj5PQphKXW--