Subject: Re: BUILDLINK_DEPENDS.gtk2 >=2.4.0?
To: Rene Hexel <email@example.com>
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
Date: 04/16/2004 10:40:45
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 03:12:19PM +1000, Rene Hexel wrote:
> But if the reasons were just the ones you mentioned in your previous
> email (major version bump, but compatible libraries)
> BUILDLINK_RECOMMENDED should be updated, not BUILDLINK_DEPENDS!
I thought major shlib bump was a reason to bump DEPENDS?
After all, there is not *.so.200 after the update, so old binary
packages _will_ fail. And I don't think that adding such links
(.so.200 -> .so.400) is a good idea.