Subject: Re: Pull-ups to the 2004Q1 branch (was: CVS commit: pkgsrc/multimedia)
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Jonathan Perkin <email@example.com>
Date: 04/14/2004 16:56:10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
* On 2004-04-14 at 16:34 BST, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> At this time (as I understand it), we don't plan to have every
> fix pulled up to the stable branch. The pullups should be all
> security fixes and crucial infrastructure bug fixes.
> We don't have the resources (and maybe don't have the desire)
> to pull up all bug fixes.
FWIW, I do. I'd love to have a stable branch on which to get as
many packages building on Solaris as can be achieved without
significant infrastructure changes (e.g. the bl3 handling of GCC
flags), which I think would be a great selling point.
I'm finding HEAD pkgsrc far too unstable right now, as I haven't
been able to do a Solaris bulk build in weeks now due to various
bugs, and so I have resorted to working on a local copy of the
branch so that I can have a stable base on which to work.
If the only thing stopping us from having a permanent
pkgsrc-stable branch with periodic tags for security pullups is
a resource issue, then count me as someone who would happily
work on it.
Jonathan Perkin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
BBC Internet Services http://www.perkin.org.uk/jonathan/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----