On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, maintainer for security/gnupg wrote:

> So far this looks ok. Please track this down.

Under Linux:

./gnupg-1.2.4/keyserver/Makefile:GPGKEYS_MAILTO =
./keyserver/Makefile:EXTRA_SCRIPTS = gpgkeys_mailto
./keyserver/Makefile:CONFIG_CLEAN_FILES = gpgkeys_mailto gpgkeys_test

Under NetBSD:

./keyserver/Makefile:GPGKEYS_MAILTO = gpgkeys_mailto
./keyserver/Makefile:EXTRA_SCRIPTS = gpgkeys_mailto
./keyserver/Makefile:libexec_SCRIPTS = gpgkeys_mailto
./keyserver/Makefile:CONFIG_CLEAN_FILES = gpgkeys_mailto gpgkeys_test

So I looked at the configure script ... it was obvious for me:

It defines GPGKEYS_MAILTO for when it has a mail transport program.

-checking for sendmail... no
+checking for sendmail... /usr/sbin/sendmail

So I added:

CONFIGURE_ARGS+=        --with-mailprog=/usr/sbin/sendmail

And then:

  checking for a mail transport program... /usr/sbin/sendmail

(It does not really check.)

And then:
 $ grep MAILTO work.puget/gnupg-1.2.4/Makefile
 GPGKEYS_MAILTO = gpgkeys_mailto

We don't have any package to say this is a "sendmail".

And, yes, I don't currently have a /usr/sbin/sendmail installed. (Maybe if
I installed mailwrapper first, I wouldn't have seen this.)

Anyways, the package should build consistently.

Can I commit this line?
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=        --with-mailprog=/usr/sbin/sendmail

It seems fine for Linux and NetBSD.

It seems like I read another discussion that was assume
/usr/sbin/sendmail (versus /usr/lib/sendmail) anyways with pkgsrc.

> > By the way, I am now building it with USE_BUILDLINK3.
>
> I converted the package to use bl3.

Thanks.

   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://bsd.reedmedia.net/