Subject: Re: pax be named optionally as "pax-as-tar"?
To: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 04/04/2004 13:35:28
--W0aTc4glj2tAL0uF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 04:14:52PM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:

> Please share your feedback. (I'd never use GTAR_PROGRAM_PREFIX so maybe
> that is not needed.)
>=20
> I hope to use this idea also for gcpio package which also has pax
> conflict.

this is similar to what we've done in pkgsrc with other packages that
conflict if GNU_PROGRAM_PREFIX=3D"", and it looks good to me.

grant.


--W0aTc4glj2tAL0uF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAb4KAluYOb9yiFXoRAsa9AKCweqS2e5DPF4bn8Ndz65xyRVkfSQCgrM4+
R9Xz7AtAWlDF/Y2L/VwRmC0=
=0RoW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--W0aTc4glj2tAL0uF--