tech-pkg: Re: should NO_BUILD imply USE

Subject: Re: should NO_BUILD imply USE_LANGUAGES= ?
To: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
From: Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.unixbsd.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 03/31/2004 06:02:23

--Signature=_Wed__31_Mar_2004_06_02_23_+0200_eno.sEqzjlOLjeb_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:29:46 +1000
grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org> wrote:

> I just noticed that NO_BUILD does not implicitly set USE_LANGUAGES to
> an empty value.
> 
> should it?

You should IMHO :)
 
> I'd think the cases where NO_BUILD is defined but we do need the
> compiler are limited to none, and in those cases we can easily
> set USE_LANGUAGES appropriately.

That's true, so +1.

-- 
	Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.unixbsd.org>

--Signature=_Wed__31_Mar_2004_06_02_23_+0200_eno.sEqzjlOLjeb_
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAakLPypkLYVDran0RAk4DAJ9ueKSgmKmE/uYB7oJBi2qaqVVepQCdGQfo
K66QQ2ScZFbCoulY5fI2soo=
=hrj9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Wed__31_Mar_2004_06_02_23_+0200_eno.sEqzjlOLjeb_--