Subject: Re: what's wrong with iconv?
To: Jeremy C. Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Robert Lillack <email@example.com>
Date: 03/20/2004 01:05:28
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> I am guessing that it did not get buildlinked. Look for it under
According to .../.buildlink/.buildlink_iconv_done it was
buildlinked but the links to the includes and libs are in
.x11-buildlink. How come? I just copied .x11-buildlink
over .buildlink but thats no real solution.
What's wrong here?
I have set X11BASE to /usr/pkg and have no xpkgwedge
installed. Should I? This machine has *no* X installed and
why .x11-buildlink if I'm building a package which does
not need X?!
> Check this out on my NetBSD 1.6.2 system:
I get exactly the same results.
r o b e r t | l i l l a c k
secure mail key: 0xE7FFDF77