On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Thomas Klausner wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:55:23PM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > Should we force _OPSYS_LIBTOOL_REQD to be bumped?
>
> Yes, I think that's necessary.

So would we bump _OPSYS_LIBTOOL_REQD for only certain operating systems in
the mk/defs.*.mk files?

Or just set LIBTOOL_REQD in mk/bsd.pkg.mk?

I think that LIBTOOL_REQD?= should be good enough. Can I do the following?

--- mk/bsd.pkg.mk	2 Mar 2004 15:25:23 -0000	1.1415
+++ mk/bsd.pkg.mk	9 Mar 2004 17:34:22 -0000
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@
 .if defined(_OPSYS_LIBTOOL_REQD)
 LIBTOOL_REQD=		${_OPSYS_LIBTOOL_REQD}
 .else
-LIBTOOL_REQD?=		1.4.20010614nb11
+LIBTOOL_REQD?=		1.5.2nb4
 .endif
 #

(nb4 is a "Fix version_type settings for the non-NetBSD platforms in the
CXX and F77 cases." nb3 is "Pull in the fix for the symlink
vulnerability.")



   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://www.reedmedia.net/