Subject: Should bsd.buildlink3.mk use BUILDLINK_PACKAGES for x11-links?
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.unixbsd.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 03/06/2004 13:23:11
--Signature=_Sat__6_Mar_2004_13_23_11_+0100_iMPPguURrj4gf=hT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hi Johnny,

With 1.102 of bsd.buildlink3.mk all x11 packages doesn't add the x11-links
dependency, should we add BUILDLINK_PACKAGES for this?

I'm not sure if this patch it's ok, but at least it works.

Index: bsd.buildlink3.mk
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/mk/buildlink3/bsd.buildlink3.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -r1.103 bsd.buildlink3.mk
--- bsd.buildlink3.mk   6 Mar 2004 09:46:05 -0000       1.103
+++ bsd.buildlink3.mk   6 Mar 2004 12:17:44 -0000
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@
 USE_X11_LINKS?=                        YES
 .  if !empty(USE_X11_LINKS:M[yY][eE][sS])
 BUILDLINK_DEPENDS+=            x11-links
+BUILDLINK_PACKAGES:=           ${BUILDLINK_PACKAGES:Nx11-links}
+BUILDLINK_PACKAGES+=           x11-links
 _BLNK_X11_LINKS_PACKAGE=       x11-links
 .  else
 _BLNK_X11_LINKS_PACKAGE=       # empty


-- 
	Juan RP <juan@xtraeme.unixbsd.org>

--Signature=_Sat__6_Mar_2004_13_23_11_+0100_iMPPguURrj4gf=hT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAScKyypkLYVDran0RAoJPAKCFDpBgOW3pzkQ0xiNKeF+thvOMaACgpgI+
QEj0dseAs0ziX0sCw7/JBPg=
=ngFK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sat__6_Mar_2004_13_23_11_+0100_iMPPguURrj4gf=hT--