Subject: Re: GKrellM2 import
To: Quentin Garnier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Lurch <email@example.com>
Date: 02/22/2004 17:01:32
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 05:13:49PM +0100, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> Le Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:30:16 +0100 (CET)
> Hubert Feyrer a ecrit :
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> > > What do you think? Is it worth it to keep a GTK+-1.2/glib-1.2 version
> > > around?
> > Is there a good reason?
> I don't see any good reason, and nobody helped me finding one.
> Since I now have a replacement in -wip for every gkrellm plugin we
> currently package, I will import gkrellm2 and its plugins tomorrow (late
> evening CET) as a replacement of the gkrellm1 pacakages.
> Unless someone strongly objects, of course.
> Quentin Garnier - firstname.lastname@example.org - cube@NetBSD.org
> "Feels like I'm fiddling while Rome is burning down.
> Should I lay my fiddle down and take a rifle from the ground ?"
> Leigh Nash/Sixpence None The Richer, Paralyzed, Divine Discontents, 2002.
Very little objection here, I'm wondering how large GKrellM2 is though... I'm
using it on an _old_ laptop...
This life is a test. It is only a test. Had this been an actual life, you
would have receive further instructionsas to what to do and where to go.