Subject: Re: converting to buildlink3
To: Klaus Heinz <email@example.com>
From: Marc Recht <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/15/2004 20:20:13
> do I undertand mk/buildlink3/README correctly that _every_ package has
> to have USE_BUILDLINK3=yes, even if it had no need to use the older
> buildlink2? Eg, simple Perl packages would fit this description.
AFAIK yes, if you want support other installation types than "overwrite",
but I might be wrong...
Wouldn't it make sense to put
in bsd.pkg.defaults.mk ?