Subject: Re: Patch naming
To: Michal Pasternak <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
Date: 01/12/2004 23:57:31
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:55:45PM +0100, Michal Pasternak wrote:
> > in some ways I prefer patched named as you propose... you mentioned
> > that patch order is not important, however sometimes when touching
> > files which autoconf/automake will play with, you do need to get the
> > order right.
> Out of pure curiosity -- could you provide an example of such situation?
I looked, but couldn't find the package where this was an issue.
touching configure.in then configure definitely avoided the package
re-running autoconf, though.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----