Subject: Re: doc/CHANGES documenting every little PKGREVISION
To: Jeremy C. Reed <email@example.com>
From: Alistair Crooks <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/04/2004 10:26:31
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:54:31AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> It doesn't seem right that doc/CHANGES should document every PKGREVISION
> Since that file is used to generate a webpage, it seems like unuseful
> information for the CHANGES to list over 500 packages bumped because of
> tiff bump.
> I do not plan on documenting all that to CHANGES, and only will note that
> tiff itself was upgraded.
> Please let me know if that is okay.
Why do you think that you have to mention every bump to PKGREVISION
Alistair Crooks <email@example.com>