Subject: Re: doc/CHANGES documenting every little PKGREVISION
To: Jeremy C. Reed <email@example.com>
From: Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/03/2004 12:07:21
On Saturday 03 January 2004 09:54, you wrote:
> It doesn't seem right that doc/CHANGES should document every PKGREVISION
> Since that file is used to generate a webpage, it seems like unuseful
> information for the CHANGES to list over 500 packages bumped because of
> tiff bump.
> I do not plan on documenting all that to CHANGES, and only will note that
> tiff itself was upgraded.
> Please let me know if that is okay.
I agree on this. But wait for more answers ;)
Julio M. Merino Vidal <email@example.com>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/