Subject: doc/CHANGES documenting every little PKGREVISION
To: None <tech-pkg@netbsd.org>
From: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 01/03/2004 00:54:31
It doesn't seem right that doc/CHANGES should document every PKGREVISION
bump.

Since that file is used to generate a webpage, it seems like unuseful
information for the CHANGES to list over 500 packages bumped because of
tiff bump.

I do not plan on documenting all that to CHANGES, and only will note that
tiff itself was upgraded.

Please let me know if that is okay.

   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://bsd.reedmedia.net/