Subject: Re: Patch naming
To: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
From: Michal Pasternak <email@example.com>
Date: 12/30/2003 22:55:45
> in some ways I prefer patched named as you propose... you mentioned
> that patch order is not important, however sometimes when touching
> files which autoconf/automake will play with, you do need to get the
> order right.
Out of pure curiosity -- could you provide an example of such situation?
Michal Pasternak :: http://pasternak.w.lub.pl :: http://winsrc.sf.net