Subject: Re: Patch naming
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Chris Pinnock <email@example.com>
Date: 12/30/2003 19:53:32
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:49:56PM -0500, Chuck Yerkes wrote:
> One thing I like from another BSD is that the patches are
> named for the FILES they change.
> Since it's a patch per file, ORDER isn't terribly
> necessary. (so the patch-aa needn't precede patch-ab
> which the current system implies).
> And it's a nice way to make it easier to see what's being patched.
> Bottom line:
> more clarity
> less ... hmmm. alphabetic.?
> I put it out there for consideration and discussion.
IMV, the system becomes less elegant if the target pathnames are long