Subject: Re: pkg/22556 and libstdc++.so.5.0.5?
To: Nick Hudson <email@example.com>
From: Adam C. Migus <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/15/2003 17:48:32
On Monday 15 December 2003 05:34 pm, Nick Hudson wrote:
> On Monday 15 December 2003 9:32 pm, Adam C. Migus wrote:
> > It appears as others have pointed out that the fix is not so simple
> > as the patch I submitted and my apologies for assuming so. Again
> > as others have pointed out it seems like this might in fact, be a
> > libtool issue.
> > Has anything else been done with this issue since? Is there a
> > libtool person out there who might shed some light on the
> > situation?
> pkgsrc libtool is patched to make all the (supported) platforms use
> the same numbering scheme. A package that doesn't define
> LIBTOOL_OVERRIDE appropriately would mean that the default libtool
> numbering would be used.
So I guess it's a bug in libtool as the package doesn't declare
LIBTOOL_OVERRIDE but does generate different version numbers; 5.5 for
NetBSD, 5.0.5 for Linux and 5.0.5 on Solaris are known.