Subject: [ CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/p5-Net-Server]
To: None <>
From: grant beattie <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 12/05/2003 02:39:24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

this reminds me.. why do we continue to have these? it seems crazy
given the hisorically limited length of svr4 package names, and when
not all packages have them.

pkgsrc is pkgsrc is pkgsrc. any tool which builds svr4 packages from
pkgsrc packages should just DTRT with PKGNAME, imho. can't we just
drop SVR4_PKGNAME entirely?


Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

	by (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) with SMTP id hB3JPZO21349
	for <>; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 06:25:35 +1100 (EST)
  by with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 19:25:30 -0000
	id D4EF42DA1D; Wed,  3 Dec 2003 19:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: Klaus Heinz <>
Subject: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/p5-Net-Server
Message-Id: <>
Date: Wed,  3 Dec 2003 19:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0

Module Name:	pkgsrc
Committed By:	heinz
Date:		Wed Dec  3 19:25:30 UTC 2003

Modified Files:
	pkgsrc/net/p5-Net-Server: Makefile

Log Message:
Change SVR4_NAME (already used by p5-Net)

To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -r1.6 -r1.7 pkgsrc/net/p5-Net-Server/Makefile

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.