Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3 issue
To: David S. <email@example.com>
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
Date: 11/23/2003 21:02:54
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 12:10:34AM -0800, David S. wrote:
> I can confirm this. I built 'pkgsrc/security/sfs' on a -current system
> (i386 1.6ZE) and got gcc 2.95.3 too. The build for that crapped out on
> 'loop.c'. The fix is trivial, but why do should I need gcc 2.95.3?
> Lodking at the 'sfs' Makefile, I'm not ever sure how this superfluous
> dependcy is enforced.
There was a superfluous USE_PKGSRC_GCC line in there -- I
removed it, since the package builds fine with gcc2 and
gcc3 from the base system.